How can I force a new page after a group has been printed?
Ex:
Group 1a (can be on many pages)
Group 1b (needs to stay hidden until Group 1a prints)
Group 1a Footer Prints.
Then For a new page then... Group 1b prints (which takes up the whole page)Check the 'New Page after' in the 'Section Expert' for the GF1a.
Showing posts with label pages. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pages. Show all posts
Monday, March 12, 2012
Saturday, February 25, 2012
New db?
I am going to design a new db that will be accessed thru web pages on my
intranet and the internet. Currently I am using a MS Access db and I have
been told that this is not the best, most efficient "core" for a db. Will
the "Express" edition of MS SQL give me what I am looking for or do I need
to look at the Workgroup Edition? I want to make sure that what ever I use,
it will be robust enough to handle growth.
Hello,
Express edition has a limitation 4 GB database size, So it may not be a good
oprion for you. COnsidering the features available in SQL Server standard
edition
I will recommend you for standard edition over workgroup edition. Take a
look into the below URL:-
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/bknight/comparisonofsqlserver2005editions.asp
Thanks
Hari
"Jeff Klein" <jklein@.nospam> wrote in message
news:%232IHD9jRHHA.3592@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I am going to design a new db that will be accessed thru web pages on my
>intranet and the internet. Currently I am using a MS Access db and I have
>been told that this is not the best, most efficient "core" for a db. Will
>the "Express" edition of MS SQL give me what I am looking for or do I need
>to look at the Workgroup Edition? I want to make sure that what ever I
>use, it will be robust enough to handle growth.
>
|||Since you're coming from Access/JET, SQL Server Express would be the best
first step. Yes, it has a 4GB database limit but unless you're storing BLOBs
in the database, this would be more than enough for a seriously large
database. Yes, there are features in the Workgroup and Standard that might
prove useful (eventually), but (again), given that you're coming from JET, I
don't expect you'll need them.
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com/blog/billva
www.betav.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________
Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book:
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
------
"Jeff Klein" <jklein@.nospam> wrote in message
news:%232IHD9jRHHA.3592@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I am going to design a new db that will be accessed thru web pages on my
>intranet and the internet. Currently I am using a MS Access db and I have
>been told that this is not the best, most efficient "core" for a db. Will
>the "Express" edition of MS SQL give me what I am looking for or do I need
>to look at the Workgroup Edition? I want to make sure that what ever I
>use, it will be robust enough to handle growth.
>
intranet and the internet. Currently I am using a MS Access db and I have
been told that this is not the best, most efficient "core" for a db. Will
the "Express" edition of MS SQL give me what I am looking for or do I need
to look at the Workgroup Edition? I want to make sure that what ever I use,
it will be robust enough to handle growth.
Hello,
Express edition has a limitation 4 GB database size, So it may not be a good
oprion for you. COnsidering the features available in SQL Server standard
edition
I will recommend you for standard edition over workgroup edition. Take a
look into the below URL:-
http://www.sqlservercentral.com/columnists/bknight/comparisonofsqlserver2005editions.asp
Thanks
Hari
"Jeff Klein" <jklein@.nospam> wrote in message
news:%232IHD9jRHHA.3592@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I am going to design a new db that will be accessed thru web pages on my
>intranet and the internet. Currently I am using a MS Access db and I have
>been told that this is not the best, most efficient "core" for a db. Will
>the "Express" edition of MS SQL give me what I am looking for or do I need
>to look at the Workgroup Edition? I want to make sure that what ever I
>use, it will be robust enough to handle growth.
>
|||Since you're coming from Access/JET, SQL Server Express would be the best
first step. Yes, it has a 4GB database limit but unless you're storing BLOBs
in the database, this would be more than enough for a seriously large
database. Yes, there are features in the Workgroup and Standard that might
prove useful (eventually), but (again), given that you're coming from JET, I
don't expect you'll need them.
____________________________________
William (Bill) Vaughn
Author, Mentor, Consultant
Microsoft MVP
INETA Speaker
www.betav.com/blog/billva
www.betav.com
Please reply only to the newsgroup so that others can benefit.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
__________________________________
Visit www.hitchhikerguides.net to get more information on my latest book:
Hitchhiker's Guide to Visual Studio and SQL Server (7th Edition)
and Hitchhiker's Guide to SQL Server 2005 Compact Edition (EBook)
------
"Jeff Klein" <jklein@.nospam> wrote in message
news:%232IHD9jRHHA.3592@.TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...
>I am going to design a new db that will be accessed thru web pages on my
>intranet and the internet. Currently I am using a MS Access db and I have
>been told that this is not the best, most efficient "core" for a db. Will
>the "Express" edition of MS SQL give me what I am looking for or do I need
>to look at the Workgroup Edition? I want to make sure that what ever I
>use, it will be robust enough to handle growth.
>
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)