Hi all,
I have multiple full-text catalogs on about 8 tables (sql server 2005 ee -
all varchar(max)).
A few days ago, they all went to an idle status and won't start picking up
any new changes - all catalogs are auto update.
when i say 'idle' - mean :
objectpropertyex ( [table object_id] , 'TableFulltextPopulateStatus' ) = 0
objectpropertyex ( [catalog_id] , PopulateStatus) = 0
and
objectpropertyex ( table object_id , 'TableFulltextItemCount' ) shows that
there are many rows missing from the table so there is much work to be done.
i have seen this once before and ended up doing a rebuild but I hope to
avoid that this time around as it takes several days to rebuild all catalogs.
Has anyone seen anything similar to this or have any suggestions for the
full-text catalog to start 'picking back up' the auto changes?
Many thanks,
Robert Towne
check the full text logs, they can be found in C:\Program Files\Microsoft
SQL Server\MSSQL.1\MSSQL\LOG and will look like SQLFT0005600015.log
http://www.zetainteractive.com - Shift Happens!
Looking for a SQL Server replication book?
http://www.nwsu.com/0974973602.html
Looking for a FAQ on Indexing Services/SQL FTS
http://www.indexserverfaq.com
"sql411@.nospam.com" <sql411nospamcom@.discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message news:D77BD52A-7107-4284-8522-60E95C45E15E@.microsoft.com...
> Hi all,
> I have multiple full-text catalogs on about 8 tables (sql server 2005 ee -
> all varchar(max)).
> A few days ago, they all went to an idle status and won't start picking up
> any new changes - all catalogs are auto update.
> when i say 'idle' - mean :
> objectpropertyex ( [table object_id] , 'TableFulltextPopulateStatus' ) = 0
> objectpropertyex ( [catalog_id] , PopulateStatus) = 0
> and
> objectpropertyex ( table object_id , 'TableFulltextItemCount' ) shows that
> there are many rows missing from the table so there is much work to be
> done.
> i have seen this once before and ended up doing a rebuild but I hope to
> avoid that this time around as it takes several days to rebuild all
> catalogs.
> Has anyone seen anything similar to this or have any suggestions for the
> full-text catalog to start 'picking back up' the auto changes?
> Many thanks,
> Robert Towne
|||Thanks, Hilary. I checked the logs initially and only saw a pause (from
backup) and resume (backup finished). it was weird because it happened
across all full-text catalogs - i could still do a contains search but they
just were idle as far as adding new records.
I did a reboot and that cleared it up. (I was hoping to avoid the reboot as
we are always doing business and it is difficult to get a maintenance period).
Thanks again,
robert
Showing posts with label max. Show all posts
Showing posts with label max. Show all posts
Monday, March 19, 2012
Monday, February 20, 2012
New data types in SQL Server 2005
SQL Server 2005 has some new data types like XML, varchar(MAX). Are they
supported by C# in Visual Studio 2003 and 2005?Hi Roy
From http://tinyurl.com/c2glu
DataTypes - UDTs, the XML data type, and "MAX" BLOBs and CLOBs
SQL Server 2005 adds support for user-defined types, a native XML data type
and better large data support. Large data support is improved by using the
Transact-SQL types VARCHAR(MAX), NVARCHAR(MAX) and VARBINARY(MAX).
User-defined types and a native XML type are defined by the SQL:1999 and
SQL:2003 specifications. To use these data types with SqlClient, new classes
in the System.Data.SqlTypes namespace are defined (SqlUdt and SqlXml),
support is added to the SqlDbTypes enumeration and IDataReader.GetValue was
enhanced to support returning UDTs as .NET Object types, and support
returning XML as a .NET String.
These new SQL Server 2005 types are supported in DataReaders returned from
SQL SELECT statements and as Parameters using SqlParameter. A special class,
SqlMetaData, can return information about extended properties of these new
data types, such as the XML schema collection that a strongly typed XML
column adheres to, or the database name of a UDT. You can use these types
from the client directly, in generic code, and also in the DataSet. Finally
you can perform partial updates on the "MAX" data types from the client,
which required using special SQL functions before ADO.NET 2.0.
You may also want to look at the Hands-On Labs in the resource kit.
For more information check out http://msdn.microsoft.com/SQL/2005/
John
"Roy" wrote:
> SQL Server 2005 has some new data types like XML, varchar(MAX). Are they
> supported by C# in Visual Studio 2003 and 2005?
supported by C# in Visual Studio 2003 and 2005?Hi Roy
From http://tinyurl.com/c2glu
DataTypes - UDTs, the XML data type, and "MAX" BLOBs and CLOBs
SQL Server 2005 adds support for user-defined types, a native XML data type
and better large data support. Large data support is improved by using the
Transact-SQL types VARCHAR(MAX), NVARCHAR(MAX) and VARBINARY(MAX).
User-defined types and a native XML type are defined by the SQL:1999 and
SQL:2003 specifications. To use these data types with SqlClient, new classes
in the System.Data.SqlTypes namespace are defined (SqlUdt and SqlXml),
support is added to the SqlDbTypes enumeration and IDataReader.GetValue was
enhanced to support returning UDTs as .NET Object types, and support
returning XML as a .NET String.
These new SQL Server 2005 types are supported in DataReaders returned from
SQL SELECT statements and as Parameters using SqlParameter. A special class,
SqlMetaData, can return information about extended properties of these new
data types, such as the XML schema collection that a strongly typed XML
column adheres to, or the database name of a UDT. You can use these types
from the client directly, in generic code, and also in the DataSet. Finally
you can perform partial updates on the "MAX" data types from the client,
which required using special SQL functions before ADO.NET 2.0.
You may also want to look at the Hands-On Labs in the resource kit.
For more information check out http://msdn.microsoft.com/SQL/2005/
John
"Roy" wrote:
> SQL Server 2005 has some new data types like XML, varchar(MAX). Are they
> supported by C# in Visual Studio 2003 and 2005?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)